In These Times has a pretty interesting article up, “Girls Gone Anti-Feminist,” by Susan J. Douglas, and though I had some problems with the article, I thought I’d post it as a good segue into a topic I’ve been meaning to explore here on my blog. Why aren’t all women feminists?
First, some things everyone should know (and they’re all in the article):
- “In 1999, the top five jobs for women did not include attorney, surgeon or CEO. They were, in order, secretaries, retail and personal sales workers (including cashiers), managers and administrators, elementary school teachers and registered nurses. Farther down among the top 20 were bookkeepers, receptionists, cooks and waitresses.”
- “In 2007, the top five jobs for women were, still, secretaries in first place, followed by registered nurses, elementary and middle school teachers, cashiers and retail salespersons. Farther down the line? Maids, child care workers, office clerks and hairdressers. Not a CEO or hedge fund manager in sight.”
- “A year out of college, [women] earn 80 percent of what men make. And 10 years out? A staggering 69 percent.”
- The national median income for women in 2008 was $36,000 a year, 23 percent less than their male counterparts.
- “In the United States, we have the flimsiest support network for mothers and children of any industrialized country, nearly 2 million women are assaulted each year by a husband or boyfriend, and 18 percent of women have reported being the victim of a completed or attempted rape.”
- “White women still make 75 cents to a man’s dollar, and it’s 62 cents for Black women and only 53 cents for Latinas. The majority of families with children in poverty are headed by single women.”
The article as a whole is more about how the media and the entertainment industry are operating as if we’re in this mystical “post-feminist” society (meaning that everything that the feminist movement wanted to accomplish has been accomplished and we don’t have to worry about it anymore), and in doing so, has become distinctly anti-feminist. This delusion is dragging many, many young women down, so that fewer and fewer of them are aware of the injustices they face everyday, and hardly any would identify as “feminist.”
But the facts are hard to deny.
So the question remains: why are women so afraid to identify as feminists?
My own experience with this “phenomenon” is pretty depressing, though I imagine that it’s similar to what every self-identified feminist goes through. I can honestly say I wasn’t entirely aware of the stigma surrounding the word “feminist” until recently, so I’ve touted myself as such since a fairly young age. However, after a while I started to pick up on how people react when the situation arises where I have to identify as a feminist. Believe me, it was a shocker when I found out that not all women are feminists, and even more of a shocker when I found out that, in truth, not many women are feminists at all (or at least not many are willing to proclaim themselves as such). I constantly hear, “Well, I’m not really a feminist” (even worse if they tack on the phrase “like you” at the end of that declaration). I have friends and family members who feel the need to occasionally identify me as a feminist (sometimes they adorn it with lovely adjectives like “militant” or “hardcore,” even though I really wouldn’t describe myself in that manner) to people who don’t know me that well, sometimes as a way to brush off some “ludicrous” opinion I have. I have no problem with them calling me a feminist, and clearly I wear that badge, no problems. But why should that be such a distinguishing characteristic? And why do they often say it like a disclaimer, as if it’s some sort of warning to others?
It seems that this notion that feminists are humorless, ugly, gay, mean, man-haters, etc., has rooted itself deeply into our culture. I’m not humorless (at least I don’t think so; I won Best Non-Musical Act for my stand-up in the talent show senior year of high school – la dee dah), and I’ve met some hysterical feminists (there are many, many funny ladies who I’d label feminists, including my favorite stand-up comedian, Maria Bamford, and Tina Fey, not to mention the commenters on feminist pop culture website Jezebel, who are often hysterical). I think that there are plenty of attractive feminists out there, including many celebrities. There are many gay feminists, but to say that every feminist is a lesbian is to say that every man who figure skates or does musical theater is gay (in case you were wondering, that’s also not true). I don’t think that feminists are mean. Quite the contrary, in fact. Because they stand for equal rights, they tend to be very accepting and willing to take on the causes of any group of people who are treated unfairly. The idea that all feminists are man-haters is particularly irritating. I’m not going to lie and say that there aren’t women out there who hate men. That’s just as absurd as saying that there aren’t men who hate women. However, to characterize all feminists as man-haters is unfair. The vast, vast majority of feminists are all for gender equality, which would afford women and men equal rights, equal wages, equal treatment under the law, etc. In fact, I’ve seen and heard of feminists sticking up for the rights of men, as well. Feminists in Great Britain helped to get men a paternity leave at work. We don’t want to “rule” the men, nor do we want to “make up for” the years of oppression we’ve suffered through. We just want the same rights as them. Simple as that.
Of course, the fact that I’m attempting to debunk some common opinions about feminists on my inconsequential little blog isn’t going to do much in the way of convincing women to accept the title of “feminist.” I realize that, and I realize just how omnipresent and dynamic the “ew, feminism” stigma is. To illustrate, here are a few comments left on the post on OhNoTheyDidn’t where I found the “Girls Gone Anti-Feminist” article (I’ll include the username of the person that said it, because that seems like a fair “quote attribution” tactic):
“A lot of people I talk to have the basic beliefs that make them feminists, and they pretty much know the true definition of the term, but they still don’t think they’re feminists because equality of the sexes isn’t something they think about very often.” –strictlytrash
“I hate the fact that if I tell someone, even my female friends, that I’m a feminist, they all jump down my throats. So what if I’m a feminist? It doesn’t mean that I think I’m better than a man, it means that I think I’m equal to a man. I don’t understand women who aren’t feminists. If someone wants to tell me why they aren’t, I’m willing to listen, but most of the time, they just make a joke and change the subject. It’s like they aren’t feminists because people will make fun of them.” –theartistprince
“I know what being a feminist means, I just don’t know enough about every little aspect to call myself something. I prefer to know everything before I do something, calling myself a feminist without knowing everything about it would be the same to me as calling myself a Buddhist without knowing anything about it.” –etacanis
“Any female who says she isn’t a feminist is dumb. I know a lot of males who also consider themselves feminist. Who likes inequality?” –devolute
“[M]y gay friend gave me the most surprised and disgusted look when I ~casually told him I’m feminist, then said, “Well, just don’t preach to me.” I didn’t say anything else, it was strange.” –infidelkast
“I’m taking a women’s studies class right now and out of a group of about 40 men and women, only me and one other girl raised our hands when the teacher asked who considered themselves a feminist.” –revenantrose
“I hate that people treat feminism as such a bad word. It does not mean I’m a man-hating, cold, evil person neither does it mean I count on my looks and sexuality instead of brains. You can be a feminst [sic] and still be sexually active, wear skirts or watch certain tv shows, that’s not what makes you an anti-feminst [sic]; saying that you are inferior to men makes you one.” –iamashamed
The bottom line is this: women (and men) should not have to feel ashamed because they believe in equal rights. We’re not living in a post-feminist society right now, no matter what some deluded people say. Feminism is just as important today as it ever was, and now we have the added hurdle of this “post-feminist” myth to jump. It’s hard enough to make people care about feminism, period, but when almost everyone thinks that it’s completely unnecessary nowadays, it only makes it more difficult.
Here’s how you know if you’re a feminist:
- Are you a human?
- Do you believe that all humans are created equal and should be afforded equal opportunities?
- Specifically, do you believe that women should have the same opportunities and rights that men do?
- Do you think that women have the right to their own bodies, to do with them as they choose?
If you answered “yes” to these questions, then congratulations, you’re a feminist. Now, go get yourself educated and start wearing that “feminist” badge with pride. It’s nothing to be ashamed of, and you can adorn the badge with anything you want. Let it mean what you want it to mean, as long as it means freedom and equality for women. You don’t have to be an escort at an abortion clinic, or picket outside Rush Limbaugh’s house, or change your major to Women’s Studies, or read every one of bell hook’s books, or start dropping phrases like “male gaze,” “gender roles,” “reproductive rights,” or “patriarchy” into your everyday conversations (although I’m sure it’d be helpful if you knew what those terms referred to). But don’t be afraid to tell people that you’re a feminist, and don’t be afraid to tell them why.
Other resources:
- Portfolio.com’s statistics-filled portrait of sexism in the workplace.
- A concise, bulleted list of sexism and gender discrimination statistics.
Bonus Kate Beaton comic (because it’s funny and on topic).
Finally, this quote from an awesome interview with Gloria Steinem:
LA Times: Far and away most women believe in equal pay, equal rights, equal treatment, and yet they may shrink from the word “feminist.” How did it become a no-go?
Gloria Steinem: Because it’s been demonized by the right wing. Every time I can bear to turn on Rush Limbaugh, he’s talking about femi-Nazis. It has been distorted, just as “liberal” has.





8 comments
Comments feed for this article
March 2, 2010 at 11:03 PM
Copper
Don’t movies and tv teach us that women can never be as happy being CEOs or Doctors as they would being trophy wives and objects of desire?
I’m glad the article mentioned Legally Blonde, though. That movie makes me mad, not the least because Linda Cardellini is playing second fiddle to Reese Witherspoon, but also because of its portrayal of the ditzy bimbo as the all-powerful woman, who can not only get into Yale Law by wearing hot pink and beaming at the camera, but also become a valedictorian despite no character change whatsoever. But it’s ok, because she identifies with the trophy wife client!
Off the top of my head, strong female characters in tv, past and present, who are identified by characteristics other than their sexuality, and who never get mentioned
- All the women of The Shield, especially Danni Sofer, Claudette Wynns, and Monica Rawlings, two of whom were police Captains on the show (the one possible exception being Tina Hanlon, but really, her reliance on her looks to get ahead was shown as a weakness, not an asset)
- President Allison Taylor and IT Technician Chloe O’Brien of 24; one has been president for the last two seasons, the other has been on the show during its entire run
- Juliet Burke of Lost, a fertility doctor, car mechanic, and all-around level-headed leader type
- Ellen Harvelle of Supernatural, demon hunter and single mother
- Ellie Bartowski of Chuck, ER doctor and loving big sister
- Most of the women of Glee, most notably Sue Sylvester, but also Mercedes Jones and Tina Cohen-Chang (I say most of because there are the cheerleaders)
And then if we were to go into women who are defined along with and beyond their sexuality, there’d be a whole different list, with Joan Holloway of Mad Men headlining that, and Sarah Walker of Chuck not far behind.
Funny thing in that list; there’s not a single “reality” show female on that list. When fiction is producing better role models for women than “reality” is, there’s definitely a warped view being portrayed by the media. You really can’t tell me it’s ok for people like Snooki to be stars because there are also characters like President Taylor on tv, and then go ahead and highlight the former while ignoring the latter. And really, I know of those characters only because i watch those shows, whereas I could tell you right now that Jennifer Love Hewitt is the lead in Ghost Whisperer despite never having seen the show, because her plunging necklines on said show are well documented.
There’s also the beauty complex in music, where we have the likes of Taylor Swift paraded on tv simply because she looks liek a Barbie doll come to life, whereas on the male spectrum, we have Lil Wayne, who really cannot be called physically attractive even by Helen Keller. I’m trying to think of a female artist who makes the Billboard top 100 who wouldn’t look good in a swimsuit, and I’m drawing a blank. That’s not a coincidence.
Well, this wasn’t rambly, not at all.
March 3, 2010 at 1:24 AM
leeraloo
Oh, god, I hate “Legally Blonde” too. It’s one of the MANY “girl power” films that pretend to be some positive message for girls, but in the end, it’s just a bunch of bad messages in disguise. And I don’t think I even remember Linda Cardellini being in it. Is she the activist, frumpy classmate?
And one big omission from your list is Peggy Olsen from “Mad Men,” who is probably the best female character on TV (along with Liz Lemon). But I will go out on a tedious limb here and say that most reality television is built around sensationalism, so populating it with extreme characters is key. I don’t think many people would mistake reality TV for actual reality. But still, I get what you’re saying. It’s sad that those types of people are what we value on REALITY television. However, I would present “Teen Mom” and “16 and Pregnant” (yes I watch them) as examples because of two moms in particular, Maci and Catelynn; Catelynn has a healthy – even admirable – relationship with her boyfriend Tyler, and they make the decision to give up their daughter for adoption so that she can have a better life, and I think that’s great. And Maci is a good mom who eventually ditches her douche boyfriend because he doesn’t care about her and especially because he doesn’t seem to care about their son. But those are literally the only two examples I can think of (well, I’m sure I could make a case for various contestants on both “Project Runway” and “Top Chef,” but it’s clear that the bad
examples outweigh the good, and they’re more popular and prevalent).
I’m actually planning a big blog post about great female characters soon, in honor of Women’s History Month, so this is a relevant conversation. The good ones need more love, not just the “hot” ones.
Oh, and good comparison there with Lil Wayne (although I do know a handful of girls who think he’s the hottest thing on two legs… I have no idea why) and Taylor Swift, and about there really not being any unattractive female musicians. Granted, Kelly Clarkson is always getting put down for her appearance, but she looks like a healthy, everyday person to me, and I think she cleans up pretty well. But then, society dictates that someone’s gotta carry the “ugly” torch, and too often in the music industry, she’s the one to do it, unless Jessica Simpson decides to wear an unflattering pair of high-waisted jeans again.
March 3, 2010 at 3:27 AM
Copper
No, Linda Cardellini was the actual murderer. You couldn’t recognise her because they uglied her up with the frizzy hair and the plain jane outfits and the minimal screentime to make Witherspoon look that much more…sparkly, I guess would be the word. I honestly didn’t even know it was her until the end credits, so I can’t blame you for not remembering.
I did think of Olsen, but I was going along the line of characters whom the audience has been introduced to not via relationship storylines, and Peggy first gained prominence as being Campbell’s other woman. I think I’d characterise her more as a character defined along with and beyond her sexuality, as opposed to independent of her sexuality, which is really what I should have titled that. Liz Lemon, though, I missed, and I have no excuse for that.
See, I think Maci and Catelynn are great examples, because I’ve never heard of them before, and I don’t think anyone who hasn’t watched the show would know who they are. These types of characters are never highlighted in mass media or used to personify the shows they’re a part of.
I agree, the good ones definitely deserve more love.
March 3, 2010 at 3:40 AM
leeraloo
Oh! Now I remember who she was. Eww, she deserves better.
Hmm, I don’t think that Peggy was first introduced as Pete’s other woman. My first impression of her was as the naive young secretary who was trying to navigate the hyper-sexuality and hyper-masculinity of Madison Avenue. I guess she is developed along with and beyond her sexuality, but it’s treated differently than it is on any other show that I can think of, so it feels strange to label her character arc as such, even though it’s accurate.
And yeah, Maci and Catelynn are no Snooki or Kim Kardashian or whoever, but Catelynn was probably the most popular and well-liked mom on the show. Her story got talked about a lot, even on the internet, sometimes even on unlikely websites and blogs that were more intellectually-oriented. But does she have the high-profile ubiquity of some of her less positive reality TV counterparts? Definitely not. It’s unfortunate, but then I’m just kind of glad that there’s even one or two positive female figures on reality TV.
March 3, 2010 at 4:51 AM
mrsemmapeel
One of my teachers in school who identified herself as a feminist, asked the same question. She kind of broadened her question though to wonder why young people of today seem so reluctant to identify themselves with any kind of label or political group. It seems to be a trend, I wonder what inspired it. Is it a general disillusionment with any kind of institution, even something as vague as feminism? Or is it that we have been de-politicized by the culture that surrounds us? I’d venture to say a bit of both. I think advertisers benefit from people being desensitized to critical thought, and they seem quite keen and talented at selling apathy as a sense of culture identity of rebellion and coolness.
I think if people really think about how they feel about equality and liberty, they would agree and identify with nearly all the fundamental ideas of feminism. It’s just the word that has taken on bad connotations. For reasons you mention, but also part of the apathetic non-citizen stance that many people seem to live.
Though, women are certainly very capable of being anti-feminist. Just as men are capable of being feminist. My father works in public works, and does a lot of manual labour, drives trucks, etc. There are quite a few women who work with him, and he says that the few instances where citizens have “responded negatively” to women working to construction oriented work, have been overwhelmingly been other women. And it has always been with a great deal of vitriol, even cruelty. Not just a simple, antiquated sense that women should not be doing this, but with real disgust towards the women in question for their apparent debasement of a man’s profession. This is of course, anecdotal, but I think relevant to the debate.
March 3, 2010 at 8:58 AM
leeraloo
I think that often, people in general feel the need to define themselves in broad strokes, because they increase their chances of being liked. This would explain why people say things like, “I like all kinds of music.” No, no one likes all kinds of music. I refuse to believe that if I played some chamber choir music or bluegrass for some of the people who say “I like all kinds of music,” they would totally dig it. But I think that we live in a culture where, mostly because of the Internet, it’s too easy to have your opinions jumped on when you express them, and I think that makes people uncomfortable. I don’t think we’re taught how to make a strong argument, so to put ourselves in a situation where we might have to stand up for something we feel and support it with reasoning is, for some people, to take a big chance. Life is just easier if you can fit in the biggest boxes – if someone could just be a “person,” without any other defining characteristics, they’d probably have the easiest existence ever. And of course a lot of it can be blamed on apathy, and the idea that, “I don’t feel like standing up for my rights as a woman, but it’s no big deal because we don’t really need feminism anymore, and if we do, I’m sure someone else will take care of it.”
I agree wholeheartedly with Madeleine Albright saying, “There is a special place in hell for women who don’t help other women.” By those terms, almost any passive woman treads a bit into anti-feminism. It’s probably a little harsh, but then again, the lines between passivity and disapproval are blurry. And I think it is important to realize that men can be feminists and women can be anti-feminist. Especially with anti-feminist women, I think people have become desensitized to the point where they don’t realize that they’re doing it. It’s the danger of gender roles, mostly, and it’s kind of scary just how deeply ingrained they are in our society that we’ve stopped noticing them.
May 24, 2010 at 9:06 PM
tangerinepeach
It’s SO refreshing to see other feminist blogs around. Most of the time I stumble upon lame ones that are entitled something like “y feminism is ded” *sigh* So keep up the awesome writing
May 25, 2010 at 1:29 AM
leeraloo
Thank you so very much!